Neospector

༼ ºل͜º༼ ºل͜º༼ ºل͜º༼ ºل͜º ༽ºل͜º ༽ºل͜º ༽ºل͜º ༽

༼ ºل͜º༼ ºل͜º༼ ºل͜º༼ ºل͜º ༽ºل͜º ༽ºل͜º ༽ºل͜º ༽

༼ ºل͜º༼ ºل͜º༼ ºل͜º༼ ºل͜º ༽ºل͜º ༽ºل͜º ༽ºل͜º ༽

༼ ºل͜º༼ ºل͜º༼ ºل͜º༼ ºل͜º ༽ºل͜º ༽ºل͜º ༽ºل͜º ༽

|___|___|___|____|___|___|___|

Teller is only silent when performing, he speaks freely offstage

"You talk on-stage, I talk off-stage! That was the curse the witch put on us!"

I don't quite see why it's full of shit:

• They're not violating your free speech, overturning CU just means that free speech has to actually be a "we support this guy/thing", and not a "here's $1,000,000 for your campaign". The government censoring a film critical of a politician can vary on a case-by-case basis (is it true or is it just slander, for example?)

• While the eventual SCOTUS decision was "you can't censor this", the decision also equated money to free speech. I see no reason why you can't say "censoring free speech is bad" and "money is not the same as free speech" In case you've forgotten, judges don't always rule 100% on one side or the other.

Ect. Granted, I'm not with them, but you're jumping to conclusions about what people are trying to address by overturning the decision.

Edit: I always confuse the case that decided "corporations are people" and the case that decided "money is free speech". Please, someone correct me if I'm wrong.

How does procedural generation from quantum computers stack up to procedural generation in classical computers? Is there any particular benefit either method has that the other doesn't?

By the way thanks for the link to the quantum blur software, I'm excited to try it out.