McKoijion

"So as we began, then I felt that tongue and was like, 'Let's go, baby. You've set that pace. Let's go. I got a monster in here. Welcome. Get a taste of this.' What a lucky girl."

We don't need 10 people to do it because this guy already did it. His plan to implement an ultra-easy pre-filled tax form in California was defeated by 1 vote. Here is an NPR story about him.

Yes covering yourself with bleach and or alcohol works, but it's risks outweigh doing so.

You're going for an "actually" comment here, but they are technically correct (as well as practically correct).

Can spraying alcohol or chlorine all over your body kill the new coronavirus?

No. Spraying alcohol or chlorine all over your body will not kill viruses that have already entered your body.

You can't kill the coronaviruses inside your body by spraying yourself with alcohol, bleach, chlorine, etc. That is pure factual truth. The only way to do this would be to swim in a pool of bleach. Then the bleach would kill every cell in your body and all the viruses. But simply covering yourself bleach would not kill the viruses. So they are perfectly accurate.

In most countries around the world, you'd probably be dead...it's nice living in the first world.

Short sellers often expose executives and companies that are committing fraud. For example, Jim Chanos helped take down Enron. At the very least, they help protect investors from misallocating capital. How do you reconcile those positive things with your reforms? Short sellers, investigative journalists, whistleblowers, etc. provide a valuable service to society, and they can't be bought off as easily as a politician or government funded investigator.

Furthermore, if other investors or short-sellers are undervaluing your stock, isn't that a good thing for investors in the long run? It gives you an opportunity to buy more of the company's future cash flows at a lower price. Unless you are planning to sell the stock, what difference does it make?