I understand your position on police brutality. I can't imagine having to place more importance on a stranger's life, than your own. Self preservation is just human nature.
However, why don't cops shoot suspected criminals(or criminals) in the leg, or some place other than the chest? Even if the assailant is armed, the shock from being shot multiple times in any part of the body should be enough to disarm them, right? I would try to apprehend someone using the window provided by their shock and pain from being shot. Does that not seem like a better option than firing multiple rounds into a person's chest?
Lucky_Dulon4 karma
I understand your position on police brutality. I can't imagine having to place more importance on a stranger's life, than your own. Self preservation is just human nature.
However, why don't cops shoot suspected criminals(or criminals) in the leg, or some place other than the chest? Even if the assailant is armed, the shock from being shot multiple times in any part of the body should be enough to disarm them, right? I would try to apprehend someone using the window provided by their shock and pain from being shot. Does that not seem like a better option than firing multiple rounds into a person's chest?
View HistoryShare Link