Highest Rated Comments
Leoparda29 karma
Leoparda12 karma
It depends where you're getting your information, honestly. The original published research article will include a section that lists who funded the study, if any of the researchers were employed by a company that would have an interest in the outcome being a certain way, etc.
The main studies I look at are about medications (pharmacy student) so I can talk best from that angle. Just because Company X funds a study about a drug they make doesn't invalidate it - if the study was conducted well otherwise (double-blinded, placebo-controlled, large test group), it is still a good study. As new drugs come out, it's in pharmaceutical companies' best interests to fund studies to show if the new drug works as well as what's on the market - or if it works better - and those are two distinctly different outcomes.
Remember, researchers have the option to not publish. I think that's where the $$ bias comes more into play, personally. A company-funded research project that isn't published would be a bigger red flag to me.
Leoparda8 karma
I love it. Thanks! I have the opportunity to speak to some students to get them interested in pharmacy (and science in general) and had no idea how to approach it. Can't wait to see your next article!
Leoparda2 karma
I'd never heard of that, thanks for sharing! That's definitely a creative way to present it, there's a lot to work with there :)
Leoparda135 karma
First off, thanks for being a kick-ass woman in science! I'm always happy when I see a woman being featured in the news for her brain :)
Question: If you were to speak to a class, (middle school or high school age) what would you say to them to help inspire a love of the STEM fields?
View HistoryShare Link