If I am reading the article correctly, they are under reporting based on not representing the embodied carbon and carbon through use generated by their products sold. How would you suggest this is standardised? To avoid double counting carbon for example, Samsung accounting for the carbon in generating their product, and then Amazon counting it again when selling the product?
Kaviex2 karma
If I am reading the article correctly, they are under reporting based on not representing the embodied carbon and carbon through use generated by their products sold. How would you suggest this is standardised? To avoid double counting carbon for example, Samsung accounting for the carbon in generating their product, and then Amazon counting it again when selling the product?
View HistoryShare Link