Isn't 80% of California water usage by farmers? Private reduction of water use only has a minimal impact overall. Don't we need to come to some agreement on agricultural decisions before we start harassing civilians whose impact is minimal? How about the water use for artificially supporting salmon that could in turn support hundreds of thousands of people? The salmon would still exist in other areas. Seems like more misguided policy.
Jethro4113 karma
Isn't 80% of California water usage by farmers? Private reduction of water use only has a minimal impact overall. Don't we need to come to some agreement on agricultural decisions before we start harassing civilians whose impact is minimal? How about the water use for artificially supporting salmon that could in turn support hundreds of thousands of people? The salmon would still exist in other areas. Seems like more misguided policy.
View HistoryShare Link