Jahonay

Breaking a system of a down cd? That's terrible.

Extremists seem to believe in abrogation, which I assume you know about. Do you believe in abrogation?

One thing I notice in life is that most people have at least one different way of looking at the world than others. What is unique about your view of the world?

This is exactly why I stand up for free speech, I've heard about the "limits" of free speech a million times.

Found this part from the wiki page that explains it pretty well.

Islamic scholars have offered a range of opinion as to the technical meaning and usage of Naskh'. These span between suspension with replacement of the old verse (ibdāl) to the nullification of the old verse (ibtāl). The former, note scholars, make the coordinate clause's "We substitute something better or similar" tautological. To work around this problem exegetes such as Tabarī interpolated hukm (ruling) in place of the word āya, arguing that if a ruling is replaced the preservation or not of its wording in the mushaf is immaterial, thus letting the verse confirm the two main types of naskh.[35] Alternate interpretations were also suggested for the subordinate clause's "cause to be forgotten" (aw nansahā), such as defer or leave. This was primarily motivated by flight from the theologically repugnant idea of prophetic forgetting,[36] with Q.15:9 cited as evidence of its impossibility. Yet verses Q.17:86, Q.18:24, and Q.87:6–7 explicitly endorse its feasibility. Thus "Qur'ān-forgetting is clearly adumbrated in the Qur'ān".[37] Many ahadith also attest to the phenomenon: entire suras which the Muslims had previously recited, claims one, would one morning be discovered to have been completely erased from memory[38]

Basically, earlier parts of the quran are forgotten, because allah replaces that part with a later and better message. This essentially solves the problem of the quran contradicting itself.