Highest Rated Comments


InfoSponger66 karma

While I don't think you will actually address my points, I wonder if you Journalistically Investigated your odds of finding a receptive majority on, of all places, reddit?

Additionally:

  • You haven't covered a "covert" anything. When he nightly news broadcasts drone strikes, there is nothing covert about it.

  • Cherry picking data to support your flawed position is journalism without integrity.

  • International Humanitarian Law states nothing criminal is taking place with drone strikes because: The application of Article 8(2)(b)(iv) requires, inter alia, an assessment of:

(a) the anticipated civilian damage or injury;

(b) the anticipated military advantage;

(c) and whether (a) was "clearly excessive" in relation to (b).

Of course you read this when investigating and either used it to preclude you from writing sensationalistic tripe, or you simply didn't give a shit.

Why not write something helpful? For instance.... an article entitled:

  • STAY THE FUCK AWAY FROM INNOCENT CIVILIANS BECAUSE YOU ARE GETTING THEM FUCKING KILLED AS COLLATERAL DAMAGE FROM DRONE STRIKES!

Do you plan on making a career in yellow journalism or do you think you will develop a conscience some day and grow a backbone?

InfoSponger53 karma

What considerations go into separating conjoined twins?

InfoSponger17 karma

well THIS is quickly escalating!

InfoSponger2 karma

Neil Peart or Neil Peart

InfoSponger1 karma

why did I hear morgan freemans voice just now?