Highest Rated Comments


ImNotYourKunta80 karma

According to Natalia’s original birthdate (Sept 4,2003) in February 2021 Natalia was 17 years old. Natalia turned 7 on Sept 4, 2010.

According to the play date girl saying she was 14 when interviewed in Feb 2021, play date girl was born circa 2007 +/- a few months depending on her month of birth.

Play date girl is approximately THREE YEARS YOUNGER than Natalia, or more. So that was not a photo of 2 Six year olds, it was a photo of a 3yr old and a 6yr old.

I wish the series had caught the discrepancy at the time and confronted the play date girl’s mother on camera.

ImNotYourKunta48 karma

I was wondering about the play date with the girl who also had Diastrophic Dysplasia. It was said she was the same age as Natalia, that both were 6 years old then. But when she was interviewed, she said that she was 14. The dates aren’t lining up. Natalia is currently 19. Is this something anyone noticed or addressed because it appears the girl by her own account is significantly younger than Natalia?

ImNotYourKunta35 karma

I never seen so many pansy ass grown men in my life. And some of those women? FFS It was like being transported back in time to 1692 in Salem Massachusetts and seeing exactly how it came to pass that some “witches” were put to death. This documentary needs to be studied and taught in Universities as an example of hysteria and implicit bias.

ImNotYourKunta32 karma

In episode 4 the dad admits the mom was physically abusing Natalia and he did nothing to protect her. Recordings also show he was complicit in the cover up and the emotional abuse of her. He also admitted in a recorded interview with the detective that she was actually a child when they left her in the apartment. He also changed his claim about the so-called murder attempt on the farm with the actually not-dangerous electric fence.

So why didn’t they give her up for adoption? Probably because the new parents would have found out about the abuse and they’d have went to jail.

ImNotYourKunta24 karma

2 dentists took X-rays and gave age estimates. One in 2011 that estimated her age as between 8 and 9; another took X-rays in 2012 and estimated her age as between 6 and 9. These estimates aligned with her original birth certificate saying she was born in 2003. You see, the Barnetts knew she was a child and her birthdate was correct. They knew. They played up this fake age controversy to get rid of their responsibilities towards her, without ANY concern for the effect on her