IllCaesar
Highest Rated Comments
IllCaesar7 karma
That would be a great revival, albeit it needs to be modernized for the age of Grindr and Tinder.
IllCaesar7 karma
Just a reply for those reading this and not knowing what they're talking about: Google search for Cointel Pro. Remember when you read about it that it isn't Alex Jones hypothesizing, its FoIA disclosures.
IllCaesar2 karma
No they don't. Besides, the segment in question is factually incorrect. It says that there are only two possible variations of sex chromosomes, XY for male and XX for female. Not only are there more than two possibilities but males can be XX and females can be XY.
Now the segment itself I think is fine because its dumbed down for kids but you're a grown adult arguing in favour of the segment for all the wrong reasons. You're not arguing that a simplified version is okay for young children, you're arguing that the demonstably incorrect statements in the segment are true. If you're wondering why the segment is wrong, well, you're that very reason. They probably don't want kids to grow up to be adults who cling to this oversimplified version of biology because a lot of adults use this oversimplified version of biology to mistreat certain minorites, in this specific case being LGBTQ folks. Likewise human evolutions tends to be taught at older ages because its very easy for an oversimplified version of human evolution to teach kids to be really racist.
IllCaesar8 karma
That is why Batman doesn't give head to Superman.
View HistoryShare Link