Hypothesis_Null

It's not paranoia if they're out to get you.

Eh, the general point is still correct.

Restricting CO2 isn't going to solve the problem, because it's not politically feasible and we can't restrict it enough without severely making many people suffer. Not to mention giant developing countries like Indian and China alone are going to output enough to 'doom us all' regardless of what Americans or Europeans do. We should be looking for cheaper active alternatives to counteract the effect. Maybe the specific methods in the book won't work, but they're on the right track.

If a superficial analysis can identify the correct path, where the multitude of 'studied' analyses keep on insisting the situation is a crisis, and simultaneously push harder and harder for ineffective methods, it means a lot of people are getting overpaid for their studied analyses.

Even when politics are involved, the man stays consistent!

Okay, now Politics included, what's your favorite kind of pizza?

So... you're specifically calling out the ones who donate large sums openly, and repeatedly respond "we just don't know" on the ones who are known to funnel similarly huge amounts through unreported methods..

Seems like you're not calling out the dark money here. Just the well-lit, cleverly donated money. Seems like a good way to encourage more dark money and less transparency.