Fairchild660

Notice that the whole picture has the same noise, except from the paper, which is obviosuly different.

That's because the paper is a comparatively uniform colour and brightness. You can see the same thing on other photos of people holding up cards. For comparison, here a few other AMA verification run through FF:

• Bill Gates (link)
• Nick Offerman (link)
• Dave Grohl (link)
• Bruce Campbell (link)
• Dr. Hooshang Amirahmadi (link)

edit 1: made RES friendly

edit 2: just used /u/improbitas' software to compare the same two images, and it seems he cherry-picked the settings. In fact; using the standard settings on both images (quality: 88 - scale: 10) shows the opposite of what he claims:

• Freeman's
• Other Guy's

Hot Steaming Questions?

Well, okay, here's a shit one: What's your favourite dinosaur?

3 is my favorite caliber too.

The whole point is they have been proven to be safe. First off, GM technology has been shown time and time again not to be inherently dangerous. Close to than 2,000 peer-reviewed studies can attest to that. Moreover, for a specific GM food to go to market it has to pass much more stringent guidelines than any car or pharmaceutical.

In the face of such overwhelming scientific evidence that GMOs are safe, claiming "they could be dangerous; we just don't know" is the intellectual equivalent of saying "maybe the world is only 6,000 years old and was created in 7 days; we just don't know".

I have no question either; I just want to add to the choir of voices singing praise for your work. Thank you, Mr. Kopplin.