FWolf

I think you must provide the size of the plug. Is it a conventional plug? Is it an industrial plug? Is it the kind of plug Sasha Grey used by the end of her carreer?

It actually seems that the driver of the car can't see the overturned car just because of the truck, that it is blocking his view. I mean, kudos for caring, but he was the reason (wether he knew it or not) for the car driver to be at risk in the first place.

Edit: Ok, I'm taking a lot of heat for something I did not intent to convey. I didn't say the truck was covering the accident on purpose or that it's the truck's fault that the car didn't see the accident. It just so happened that the car had no view because the trauck was there - no judgement, just fact. The car could be at the same speed as the truck and the truck would still have covered his field of vision - again, certainly not intentionally.

Also, about this thing people are saying, that the car was passing the truck on the right. To me, it doesn't appear as the car is passing the truck on the right, I mean the car is just slightly faster - if you want to pass, you just accelerate and be one with it. It seems to me that the car is on the right, the truck is on the left, and the car just happens to be a little bit faster (about 5 km/h or so), so it'll end up passing the truck. There's a difference of intent here. In a situation (speed limit: 80km/h) where you're on the right at 75 and a guy's on the left at 70, do you just stay in your lane and, well, end up passing, or do you go to the left, end up behind the slower vehicle, and have necessarily to be stuck behind this oblivious vehicle? Doesn't seem reasonable to me.

You're shitting me! Peeing on the snow is actually part of a treaty?!

have you ever had an awkward situation prompted by your tourette that made even you giggle?

Nope, Brazil. But I'm a fan of the series.

And since we're talking about Boston, this always makes me giggle.