EvanHarpell

Well they need something. When's the last time that city won anything?

But we already have an Sto.....oooooh.

I'm at home up here in Brandon. It's getting bad, but so far is still have power and cell service.

I feel you man. I'm a Philly boy and love me some Sixer's and Eagles. So yeah. I feel you.

At least I have my Phillies...

Buying yourself into the competition is bad for the customers too, as you are forcing users to choose for your inferior platform (UI/usability wise) instead of keeping the choice.

If the exclusivity would be short timed it would be less toxic to customers but it wouldn't have the desired effect of converting users to EGS.

Here's the thing. I'm not paying for you to catch up. If you want my business, offer a better product. I'm all for competition, it lowers prices for us and moves features forward. But not being held at gun point to do so.

If the platform they were offering had just as good or better functionality and no funny business on the policies then this wouldn't be a problem at all.

But it doesn't and they are demanding money prior to getting it there. That's my issue.

We will never know, but it'd be interesting to see how much money developers end up making with a larger captive audience on Steam vs a smaller audience and bigger cut from ESG.