Esquire99

So you believe the scientific studies from the 90s that found no correlation, or even an inverse correlation, between indoor radon and lung cancer are illegitimate? Can you point to some actual scientific sources, not just conclusory but with data, that you believe support the idea that radon causes lung cancer?

There's a good deal of scientific literature out there that basically says radon mitigation is a scam, and that indoor radon does not pose a significant safety risk. How do you respond?

Fair point on vaccines and autism. But One problem some people have with the EPA and CDC's information is that it lacks any source data. All you get are conclusory statements that "radon is bad." The scientific literature that says radon is a scam is backed up with actual data.