Eckeaux30

If there’s one way to show everyone how much you know and how tough you are, it’s to be inflammatory on the Internet.

It seems like a lot of work on terrorism is either speculation or simply descriptive. In your opinion, why does the study of terrorism (more than any other phenomenon, it seems) seem to value the opinions of self-proclaimed experts and speculators more than social scientific evidence? Is there a push for inferential scientific study of terrorism?

Careful there, bud. You might cut yourself from all that edge.