Given the expose done by the globe a few years ago regarding the overwhelming leniency given to OUI offenders in the state of Massachusetts, why would the Globe take this position now? How can you expose the lack of justice to OUI offenders (civilian) and then criticize off-duty police officers for benefiting from the same system?
DonutsPlzTY3 karma
Given the expose done by the globe a few years ago regarding the overwhelming leniency given to OUI offenders in the state of Massachusetts, why would the Globe take this position now? How can you expose the lack of justice to OUI offenders (civilian) and then criticize off-duty police officers for benefiting from the same system?
View HistoryShare Link