Digibud

I tried to make it clear that I agree it is a sensational story. I just think that the story convolutes the fact. I think it would be more effective to tell the story as a story and do an investigative journalism piece as an investigation. The real struggles are lost in the current format.

Well good try, I guess.

Can you explain the thought process that lead to sensationalizing these stories instead of just reporting the facts? After 3 years on a destroyer in the 7th fleet, (left just prior to these collisions) I find the theater of these pieces cringeworthy. I am aware that there is a story to be told there, but wouldn't it be more effective to write the story in one piece and investigate in another? Much gets lost here.