Cygnus--X1

Websites that sell stressers often operate under the guise of legitimacy, and there are genuine use cases for buying stressers online. How do you decide when a website is involved in malicious activity?

The same is true for piracy for instance (The Pirate Bay CAN be used for legitimate torrents but in reality it isn't). However, in the Netherlands this has been a legal debate for years now where a judge has the final call. Do you see similarities between cases?

What do you say to journalists and others in media who are accusing you of having a a bit of a holier-than-thou attitude towards 'regular' news publications?

If you're talking about net neutrality, you're also talking about cutting off services which are in some way beneficial to customers (like free unlimited Spotify-subscriptions). Not considering the long term effects of "better competition in the market", do you think this (immediate) negative side-effect of net neutrality will make customers/voters more opposed to new regulations?

After you did a survey you found that a majority of your subscribers did not actually read many articles and that they supported The Correspondent mostly to support journalism in general, and that a majority of your views came from (free to read) Facebook/Twitter links. Is that something that you (could) see happen in the American market as well? And does that concern you?

What do you think of the BuzzFeed model (getting high views with clickbait that fund the lesser read but more in-depth articles)? They seem to have struck a pretty good balance there.