You switched from major overhauls being the cause for your version scheme
e.g.
1.x.x.x ---Huge Change---> 2.x.x.x
Why the change? We're now on like 14 or something but it feels much the same as 4.x.x.x.
EDIT: I like the more common updates, don't get me wrong, but I couldn't help but feel that it was changed so that users would feel as though more 'progress' was being made simply because there were more big numbers being changed.
I still prefer that IE update numbering system; when the big number changes, it means big change.
EDIT #2: Thanks gw280, exactly the kind of answer(s) i was looking for.
Chrysaor_GDG24 karma
You switched from major overhauls being the cause for your version scheme
e.g. 1.x.x.x ---Huge Change---> 2.x.x.x
Why the change? We're now on like 14 or something but it feels much the same as 4.x.x.x.
EDIT: I like the more common updates, don't get me wrong, but I couldn't help but feel that it was changed so that users would feel as though more 'progress' was being made simply because there were more big numbers being changed.
I still prefer that IE update numbering system; when the big number changes, it means big change.
EDIT #2: Thanks gw280, exactly the kind of answer(s) i was looking for.
View HistoryShare Link