CatoPapers

Enlighten me, please.

Why is it okay for anyone to tell a service provider or goods producer how they may sell their product? How is that "neutral"?

And why should we trust any state agency to regulate internet prices when we've seen their eagerness to regulate content??

Restaurant owners should and ARE free to deny service and employment to anyone they choose. If they're racist, you let them run their stupid little racist restaurant and don't eat there if you don't agree.

How moronic it is to believe that people should be hired based on race rather than ability.

Also, who the fuck is "we" and what gives whoever "we" is the right to tell someone who they may and may not associate with?

Edit: For the pea brains downvoting, there has always has been a difference between doing "the right thing" and doing the "legal thing". You might say "it'd be wonderful if we made the golden rule a law!!", but you'd be horribly wrong. Just because someone "should" jump into raging waters to save a drowning person, doesn't mean that they should be locked in a cage for choosing not to.

Likewise, just because someone "should" make sure to hire a token white, token black, token Asian, token handicapped person- doesn't mean you get to lock the person up if they fail to meet your moral standards.

Obviously reason is in scarce supply around here.