Bucking_Fullshit

Makes you wonder if it was running on machines of high profile politicians who had leaks.

People get it.

“Averages one false positive per week.”

How many cameras are you monitoring? It seems super high and would be a huge problem if you’re able to scale.

I had a 10-year career as an editor in print journalism 15 years ago. Broadcast is now going through what print did in the early 2000s.

Get out. It’s not worth it.

Well the article says one false positive per week on a dozen cameras. At $20 per camera that is $240 in revenue per month - far short of what’s needed to pay for a human to monitor a camera real time.