Greetings Bishop! My question regards St. Anselm of Canterbury’s proof for God’s existence. In his Proslogion, he tries to make the argument that God is, “a being than which no greater can be conceived.” He goes on in a rather circular way that the being must exist in all minds, even in people who do not believe in God. Do you believe this ontological argument holds much depth or should it be expanded upon in greater detail?
Bobcat31731 karma
Greetings Bishop! My question regards St. Anselm of Canterbury’s proof for God’s existence. In his Proslogion, he tries to make the argument that God is, “a being than which no greater can be conceived.” He goes on in a rather circular way that the being must exist in all minds, even in people who do not believe in God. Do you believe this ontological argument holds much depth or should it be expanded upon in greater detail?
View HistoryShare Link