AmadeusFlow

So let me get this straight, you only publish what you receive? Without actually looking into the entire picture (aka, both candidates)?

That sounds lazy. Why not make the effort to investigate both sides to present complete information, instead of only releasing one side, thereby creating a bias in public perception.

Trump has done shady shit. Trump University is proof enough of that. By presenting only the evidence against Hillary you've created a massive bias that almost certainly impacted the electoral outcome.

It all sounds incredibly irresponsible to me. Wikileaks used to be an organization I respected. I can't say that's true currently.

When are onion futures coming back?

Yeah, that's the joke. Our lovely government has only ever banned two futures contracts... movie tickets and onions.

The backstory is a fascinating piece of financial history at least

This is fairly well known already, at least within high finance circles...

Archegos was levered to the gills via total return swaps on high-beta growth stocks. Their exposure was so large and so spread out among counter-parties that no one had a real idea of the size until they started missing margin calls...

But what exactly has lead you to conclude that Jesus provides the "full truth" and the other religions are just the partial truth?

I'm sure the other religions would say the same exact thing about Catholicism.

I'd have a hard time believing that you would be Catholic if you were, say, raised in Afghanistan by Muslim parents.