24111

It's really hard to understand what you're trying to say, to be honest. Calm down and reorganize a bit.

Maybe you should re-evaluate your English and literacy

Another ex-communist country (I'm still young, story from mom and grandma), the communist revolution treats the educated, wealthy and landowners as 'the root of evil', and considered the uneducated, working class the 'true leaders of the country'. This was part of a huge brainwashing campaign and political silencing, peaking at lynch mobs that specifically targeted those individuals.

Individual recounts (from a relative) including when their teacher was dragged out and executed mid-class because of his diploma (French) was (obviously) written in French, and was seen as 'reactionary'. Dragged to the field and shot dead.

This particular case raises a lot of concern over the police's use of force in general, especially to response to mere suspicions and non-violent crimes. Do you believe that there's evidence of overuse of force involved with many arrests, and that the misuse of force is often overlooked?

There's also a lot of public outcry regarding how lightly the involved officers in such cases is prosecuted. Would there be an effort to increased the amount of transparency in the proceeding of such case to inform the public?

Quite frankly I don't even know what to tell you. Your argument is an incoherent mess that is quite difficult to even process where's your stance and what's your point.

Secondly, I didn't even said a single word about my opinion. To quote, BOTH my reply were to highlight the mess you called an "argument". You sure is fast in jumping guns and assuming though.

Get that through your thick skull.