1stevelation
Highest Rated Comments
1stevelation2 karma
Yesterday, irritated by the ants "invading" my desktop space, I flicked some off and left survivors, wholesome and in pieces. I noticed, one ant lost its abdomen, but was still alive and moving its antennae (perhaps releasing pheromones). Among other ants still on my desktop, there were two (Ant 1 & Ant 2) near the injured ant. Ant 1 ran frantically away from the injured ant - again, likely sending pheromones; or surveying the area. Ant 2 stayed with the injured ant. It picked up the injured ant with its mandibles before long, and took it to the main trail, without the help of Ant 1. I expected Ant 1 and Ant 2 together carry the injured ant, if possible, to ensure the fastest escape. Could it be that Ant 2, the one that rescued, was more - I don't know - emotionally attached to the injured ant?
Do ants attribute more importance to certain peers? If so, is it influenced by emotion, ancestry, or the defense of conspecifics (thanks, Google)?
1stevelation224 karma
How often do you lie about your occupation when others ask, because it’s got degrading connotations?
View HistoryShare Link