Scaryclouds
Highest Rated Comments
Scaryclouds407 karma
One of the proposed ideas for getting people to Mars is to have a one way trip. NASA, or an international coalition, would send an initial team and over time would continue to supply that team as well as send more people to Mars, the goal being setting up a permanent human settlement. Do you think this is a worthy goal of NASA/humanity? If we could only pursue one mission in the next 20-30, a colony on the moon in which the colonist could return to Earth if desired, or the above stated mission, which do you think would be a better use of our resources?
Also what do you think is the top challenge(s) we must overcome before we can voyage to Mars (be it one way or round trip)?
Scaryclouds27 karma
Yea, like Killerko said, NASA isn't checking with them every 5 minutes during the sleep time. A week, two, three, sure I could see someone going with sex/masturbation, but I don't see that happening for months/a year. Also if they can find a way for both sexes to pee in space cleanly, no reason they can't find a way for them both to "satisfy" themselves as well.
Scaryclouds4 karma
The word "Creator" is never mentioned in the U.S. Constitution. (It's mentioned in the Declaration of Independence)
Also while I understand your point, I think it is horrible that you suggest atheist must censor their viewpoint in public.
Scaryclouds1459 karma
Julian Assange said he had information on Trump but "it wasn't interesting", you guys released an email of a risotto recipe. How does this statement square?
View HistoryShare Link